Disciples of Shamballa

By Asger Lorentsen

I see Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar as the best examples of disciples of Shamballa. Both of them are characterised as follows :

1. had a tremendous impact on the history of humanity
2. had a wiseness in how to operate on the battlefields
3. had constructive and revolutionary capacities in building a new foundation for society
4. showed no cruelty in how to treat enemies
5. had personal fearlessness
6. had no lust for personal power but displayed a high degree of impersonality
7. were motivated by a vision beyond personal gain
8. disappeared from the scene of history as soon as there roles were fulfilled and without the period of enjoying their might.

The beginning sensitivity to the monad may start close to the 3rd initiation, and for pure R1 types it is plausible that a beginning sensitivity to Shamballa also starts here. No doubt we will find both Alexander and Caesar at this point of evolution as world disciples.

If we use these two figures as examples, I suggest that we divide all other possible examples in 2 catagories:

1. The 1. ray types who are being trained to become disciples of Shamballa but are not really accepted disciples of Shamballa. Here I would consider Napoleon, Akbar and Atatürk.
2. The 1. ray types who are working for personal power and only use their populations for their own end and ambition, and who are disciples or aspirants of the Dark Brotherhood. Here Saddam Hussein comes in as does J Stalin and so many other dictators. Hitler as we know was a leading example of this line.

Why is Saddam Hussein in category 2? Mainly because there is an unending history of cruelty in his handling with opposition, and because his personal defiance and pride towards the American government caused immense suffering in his people between the two gulf wars demonstrating that he had no interest in the country or people itself but only in his own personal power. Such dictators enslave their people for personal ends without having any idealism. They talk as if they are father-figures of a people, but they act as if the people is only a tool for their personal end.

In this division into 3 types we still have to find a place for Mao Tse Tung, Djenkis Khan and many others. Our issue here is, that we do not know their motives. E.g. Maos Great Leap Forward had a cost of 20.000.000 Chinese lives, but what were his motives? And did he display cruelty in his character? Was Djenkis Khan only a destroyer or also a constructor, and what was his personal defect since he allowed so many millions to die without it being part of a higher plan to open the cultural path between Europe and China? Both of these characters might have been inspired by a higher vision, played a great 1. ray role in The Great Plan and thus be aspirants to discipleship of Shamballa, but - in my opinion - Shamballa will not accept disciples who have not passed the tests of also saving lives which may be lost only because of lack of concern, lack of wisdom and lack of constructive capacities.

Besides considering these characters of dictators, emperors and generals it would be interesting to look into less recognisible figures as possible candidates for discipleship under Shamballa. Here we should look into great magicians and various avatars. E.g. was it an alignment with Shamballa which caused Mohammed to lean towards will and right action, sacred war (Jihad) and being a slave of God (e.g.: abd'Allah - Abdullah)? Was it an alignment with Shamballa, which gave M. Luther the power to free Northern Europe from the captivity of Rome?
These subjects of human history and the Great Plan must be interesting to study, when this physical embodiment is over.